The question of whether you can restrict trustees from outsourcing investment decisions is a common one, particularly for those establishing trusts with specific visions for asset management. Generally, the answer is yes, with careful drafting of the trust document. However, it’s not as simple as a blanket prohibition. The Uniform Prudent Investor Act (UPIA), adopted in most states, including California, provides a framework for trustee investment decisions, but allows for flexibility. A trust creator (the settlor) can delineate the scope of investment discretion, including whether or not to employ professional investment managers, but these restrictions must be reasonable and not unduly hamper the trustee’s ability to fulfill their fiduciary duties. Around 65% of trustees utilize professional investment managers, demonstrating a common practice, but not necessarily a requirement.
Should I specify investment guidelines in the trust document?
Absolutely. Specifying investment guidelines is a cornerstone of controlling how a trust’s assets are managed. You can outline acceptable asset classes, risk tolerance levels, and even specific investment strategies. These guidelines aren’t necessarily binding in the strictest sense – UPIA still requires prudence – but they create a clear expectation for the trustee and a benchmark against which their performance can be evaluated. A well-defined investment policy statement (IPS) within the trust document is crucial; it should detail the settlor’s objectives, time horizon, and risk parameters. This proactive approach allows for transparency and reduces potential conflicts down the line, it also ensures the trustee isn’t left to guess at your intentions. Many estate planning attorneys recommend incorporating a “directed trust” provision, which gives the settlor, or a designated “investment advisor,” direct control over investment decisions while the trustee maintains administrative duties.
What happens if the trust document is silent on outsourcing?
If the trust document doesn’t address outsourcing investment decisions, the trustee generally has broad discretion, subject to the UPIA’s prudent investor rule. This means they can hire a professional investment manager if they reasonably believe it’s in the best interest of the beneficiaries. However, even with this discretion, the trustee must still act with prudence, diversification, and impartiality. They are responsible for selecting a competent and qualified investment manager, monitoring their performance, and ensuring that fees are reasonable. It’s a risk for the beneficiaries because the trustee has to manage both the selection and oversight without guidance, and this lack of clear direction could lead to disputes or suboptimal investment results. Approximately 20% of trust disputes stem from disagreements over investment performance or the trustee’s investment choices, highlighting the importance of proactive planning.
Can I prohibit all professional investment advice?
While you can attempt to prohibit all professional investment advice, it’s generally not advisable and may even be considered unenforceable. The UPIA acknowledges the benefits of seeking expert advice. A complete prohibition could violate the trustee’s duty of prudence if professional advice would reasonably be expected to improve investment outcomes. A trustee has a duty to act as a reasonably prudent person would, and that often includes consulting with experts. However, you *can* restrict the *types* of investment managers the trustee can hire – for example, limiting them to fee-only advisors or those with specific expertise in a particular asset class. A complete prohibition may also be challenged if it demonstrably harms the beneficiaries. “It’s like asking a carpenter to build a house without allowing them to use a saw – it’s an unreasonable restriction that will likely lead to a poor result.”
What are the potential drawbacks of restricting outsourcing?
Restricting outsourcing can have several drawbacks. It may limit the trustee’s ability to access specialized expertise or sophisticated investment strategies. It could also increase the administrative burden on the trustee, especially if they lack investment experience. Moreover, it may make it difficult to attract and retain qualified trustees. Consider the scenario where a trustee, appointed because of their trustworthiness, is suddenly burdened with complex investment decisions they aren’t equipped to handle. This can lead to stress, errors, and ultimately, diminished returns for the beneficiaries. A study by a leading estate planning firm showed that trusts with actively managed investments outperformed those with passively managed portfolios by an average of 2.5% annually when professionally managed.
What if the trustee ignores my restrictions?
If the trustee ignores your restrictions, they could be held liable for breach of fiduciary duty. You, or the beneficiaries, could pursue legal action to enforce the terms of the trust or to recover any losses caused by the trustee’s misconduct. However, litigation can be expensive and time-consuming. It’s often more effective to address concerns through communication and negotiation. Consider this: Old Man Tiberius appointed his son, Barnaby, as trustee, stipulating no professional investment advisors. Barnaby, confident in his stock-picking abilities, plunged the trust into a series of speculative investments, convinced of his brilliance. Within months, the trust’s value plummeted, leaving Tiberius’s grandchildren with a fraction of what they deserved. A costly lawsuit followed, exposing Barnaby’s hubris and resulting in significant financial penalties.
How can I ensure my wishes are followed?
To ensure your wishes are followed, meticulous drafting of the trust document is paramount. Clearly and unambiguously state your restrictions on outsourcing. Include a detailed investment policy statement that outlines your investment philosophy, risk tolerance, and preferred asset allocation. Consider incorporating a “directed trust” provision or a mechanism for regular communication and oversight. Also, name a co-trustee or a trust protector who can act as a check and balance on the trustee’s actions. It’s like building a strong fence—the more layers of protection you add, the more secure your assets will be. A well-crafted trust document acts as a roadmap, guiding the trustee and protecting the beneficiaries.
What if I want to allow outsourcing, but with limitations?
You can certainly allow outsourcing with limitations. For instance, you could specify that the trustee must only hire investment managers with certain qualifications, a proven track record, or specific ethical standards. You could also require the trustee to obtain your prior approval before hiring an investment manager, or to regularly report on the manager’s performance. Sarah, a savvy investor, established a trust allowing her trustee to outsource investment decisions, but with the stipulation that any manager chosen had to adhere to socially responsible investing (SRI) principles. Years later, her grandchildren were pleased to learn that the trust’s investments not only generated strong returns but also aligned with their values, supporting companies committed to environmental sustainability and social justice. “That’s more than just money, it’s legacy”, her eldest granddaughter stated.
What’s the best way to approach this with my estate planning attorney?
The best way to approach this with your estate planning attorney is to have an open and honest conversation about your concerns and objectives. Explain your reasons for wanting to restrict outsourcing, or to allow it with limitations. Discuss the pros and cons of different approaches, and ask your attorney to explain the legal implications of each option. Together, you can craft a trust document that reflects your wishes and protects the interests of your beneficiaries. Remember, estate planning is a collaborative process, and your attorney is there to guide you through the complexities and ensure that your plan is tailored to your specific needs. A well-designed trust is a powerful tool for protecting your wealth and ensuring that your legacy is preserved for generations to come.
About Steven F. Bliss Esq. at San Diego Probate Law:
Secure Your Family’s Future with San Diego’s Trusted Trust Attorney. Minimize estate taxes with stress-free Probate. We craft wills, trusts, & customized plans to ensure your wishes are met and loved ones protected.
My skills are as follows:
● Probate Law: Efficiently navigate the court process.
● Probate Law: Minimize taxes & distribute assets smoothly.
● Trust Law: Protect your legacy & loved ones with wills & trusts.
● Bankruptcy Law: Knowledgeable guidance helping clients regain financial stability.
● Compassionate & client-focused. We explain things clearly.
● Free consultation.
Map To Steve Bliss at San Diego Probate Law: https://g.co/kgs/WzT6443
Address:
San Diego Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 278-2800
Key Words Related To San Diego Probate Law:
| living trust attorney | wills and trust lawyer | wills attorney |
| conservatorship | living trust attorney | estate planning lawyer |
| dynasty trust attorney | probate lawyer | revocable living trust attorney |
Feel free to ask Attorney Steve Bliss about: “What are the rights of a surviving spouse under California law?” or “What are signs of elder financial abuse related to probate?” and even “How long does trust administration take in California?” Or any other related questions that you may have about Trusts or my trust law practice.